As President Hollande is caught
between two lovers, do the French people care? Not a bit!
You’ve got to love the French. Their
President, Monsieur ‘Normale’ Hollande, is photographed trysting with French
actress, Julie Gayet, a stone’s throw from the Elysee Palace, where he lives
with long-time partner, Valerie Trierweiler. He exits the apartment, disguised
(or so he thinks, poor sod) by a motorcycle helmet, climbs on the back of the
motorbike driven by his bodyguard (who had, earlier in the morning, delivered
croissants to the amorous pair) and goes back home to Valerie and his many
duties as President of the Republic.
The photographs duly appear in a French
magazine called Closer, and the entire world is agog at the sight of a head of
state behaving like a love-struck adolescent. Not so the French. They simply
shrug and say the French equivalent of ‘A man’s got to do what a man’s got to
do; and what does his private life have anything to do with his public role?’
As for the President himself: not for him, denials of a love affair or anything
quite so puerile, thank you. He just puts out a statement condemning the
magazine for having intruded into his privacy, to which – like any other French
citizen – he is entitled.
Meanwhile, the First Lady (or First
Girlfriend, as some cruelly label her) checks into a hospital and lets it be
known that doctors have advised her a ‘cure de repos’ (rest cure) to recover
from the shock of learning about her partner’s affair (which she likens to
being struck by a TGV, or high-speed train). But ‘friends’ of her let it be
known that she is ready to forgive and forget so long as she gets to stay on in
her role of First Lady.
You’d think by now, the French would have
their juices flowing. Mais non. A survey conducted soon after shows an
overwhelming majority of 74 per cent reiterating that President’s Hollande’s
domestic life and love affairs are entirely his own business, and the media should
steer clear of reporting on it.
And sure enough, when Hollande arrives to
address his annual press conference at the Elysee Palace, in a room heaving
with French and international media, there are just a couple of questions about
his tangled love life. Hollande responds that this is neither the time nor the
place, and that he will clear up any doubts about who France’s First Lady is
before he embarks on a state visit to the US in February. And then he begins droning
on about his economic vision for France. A few days later, Valerie checks out
of hospital and moves into La Lanterne, the Presidential weekend residence in
the park of Versailles, to recuperate in quiet while Hollande decides whether
he will stay with her or move on with Julie.
Can you imagine events unfolding quite
like this in any other country?
How do you think it would work for President
Barack Obama if he were to be pictured sneaking out from a secret tryst with,
say, Scarlett Johansson? He would either be doing the full Clinton in a
televised press conference (“I did not have sex with that woman”) or he would
be writing his resignation after a few left jabs executed by Michelle (she of
the perfectly-toned musculature). And all of America would be up in arms at the
moral turpitude of their President. (God alone knows how President Kennedy and
his harem of women in the White House would have fared in today’s multimedia
age; fortunately for him, his Presidency was played out in front of a more
deferential world.)
Or let’s say that David Cameron was
rumbled having a bit of nookie with a famous model like Kate Moss. The British
tabloid press would go into full meltdown mode. There would be editorials
asking for Cameron to go, given that he had betrayed the family values the
Conservative Party stood for. He would be expected to make a statement
clarifying whether he and Samantha were still a couple and intended to remain
so. Kate would be door-stepped at her residence. Her friends and family would
be harassed for a quote on the affair. Columnists would write endlessly about
the fairy-tale union of David and Samantha and how it had come to such a messy
end.
There would be none of that Gallic
shrugging and saying that this was a private matter between two people (okay,
three) and that it was no one else’s business. That a politician’s private life
was nobody else’s concern so long as it did not impinge on the performance of
his public duties.
As you can probably tell, I am a fan of
the French approach. And so far at least, back home in India, we have taken our
cue from the French rather than the Americans or the Brits. We have allowed our
leaders their privacy when it comes to their love lives, unless of course, it
explodes into the public space as it did with N.D. Tiwari’s paternity case. But
so long as our leaders have behaved with discretion, we have been content to
look the other way and let them get on with it.
And if you ask me, that’s the best way to
go. A person’s private life is just that: private. We can judge them by their
public conduct but as Francois Hollande put it so elegantly, “Private affairs
must be dealt with in private. With respect for the dignity of all involved.”
Vive La France! Vive La Vie Privee!