Do you always get there? Or are you the kind who has no problems abandoning a
book half-way through?
So,
to which author falls the distinction of having written a book that heads the
list of the top five most abandoned – as in left unread till the end – titles?
I am sure it will come as a shock for you to learn that it is none other than
J.K. Rowling. But before you keel over, let me tell it is not for her Harry
Potter series, but for the first ‘grown-up’ book she wrote. And the top reason
people gave for abandoning The Casual Vacancy? Well, it wasn’t exactly Harry
Potter, was it?
Well,
as someone who has never read a single word that Rowling ever wrote (I am sorry
but all that magic-Muggles stuff is just lost on me), I am really not qualified
to comment. But the next book on the list of top five most abandoned titles
makes perfect sense to me. It is Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James, but more
on that later.
After
that, the list gets a bit mystifying. The next title that most people gave up
on is Eat Pray Love (which I loved from the word go; and long before it became
something of a cult book) on the grounds that the heroine was too ‘whiny’ and
‘self-obsessed’ followed by The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, which many found
too much of a slow starter to persist with.
Well,
I don’t know about you but I firmly believe that when it comes to books, the
world is divided into two kinds of people. The first group believes in the ‘I’ve
started so I’ll finish’ line and ploughs through to the (sometimes bitter) end
while the second just wearily intones ‘Life is too short…” and gives up the
moment boredom sets in.
Sadly,
I happen to belong to the ‘I’ve started so I’ll finish’ school so I have wasted
years of my life battling through to the last page of books that were best left
unfinished. But somehow, as far as I am concerned, to give up in the middle
seems to smack of failure. And while at a rational level, I know that the
failure is that of the writer and not mine, the reader’s, I am still reluctant
to put the book away. So, there it lies, languishing on my bedside table, so that
I can administer a sop to my uneasy conscience by reading a few pages every
night before turning in. That way, at least, it serves a purpose: it puts me to
sleep like no page-turner would.
Of
late, though, I have begun to wonder if boring, unreadable books are really
worth all that effort (not to mention the self-flagellation involved). The
thought first crossed my mind when I tried to read Fifty Shades of Grey.
Sado-masochistic bondage or Deviant Romances are not really my cup of coffee (I
am more of a Regency Romance-Georgette Heyer kind of girl) but given that
everyone was talking about it and that it behoves a columnist to be au fait
with popular culture, I tried to give it a shot.
Honest
to God, I tried. In fact, I tried three times to get beyond page 150 before
throwing the book down in disgust and flouncing off to read something –
anything! – else. No, it wasn’t the erotica that put me off (frankly, I didn’t
find it the least bit erotic) but the sheer banality of it all. Not to mention the
utterly execrable writing. (Though what really made me weep was the thought
that this book had topped the best-selling charts and made its author a millionaire
many times over.)
But
I treated Fifty Shades of Grey as a one-off. It was just one of those freak books
that you either loved or loathed; and I just happened to be one of those who
loathed it.
That
was before I downloaded Dan Brown’s Inferno on my Ipad before setting off on
holiday. Now, I am the kind of person who loves long-haul flights for exactly
one reason: you can read a nice, fat, fast-paced thriller uninterrupted for
eight hours and, with a bit of luck, finish it in one greedy mouthful. And I
had loved Dan Brown’s last page-turners, The Da Vinci Code and The Lost Symbol,
so I thought I was all set for the flight.
Not
quite. About ten minutes into the book, I was beginning to get worried. Half an
hour later, I knew I was in serious trouble. There was no way I was wading
through this bilge for the next seven hours. Well, not without losing the will
to live. Which would be rather ironic given the plot of the novel: a mad
scientist tries to infect the world with a deadly plague and succeeds. But
then, it turns out that it’s not really a deadly plague after all…ah well,
never mind.
Suffice
it to say that it took me not eight hours, but five weeks to finish the book.
And by the end, even I couldn’t quite figure out why I was persisting with the
damn thing. I couldn’t be bothered about what happened next. I didn’t care if
Professor Robert Langdon was finally killed off. Hell, I didn’t care if Dan
Brown killed off the entire human race in his parallel universe.
But
still, I persisted until the very last page. Only to ask myself why I had
bothered. Maybe the ‘I’ve started so I’ll finish’ argument has run its course
and it is time to remember that life is, indeed, too short.
2 comments:
i too belong to the 'i've started it , so i'll finish it' category. However, such treatment is reserved only for novels and not for textbooks(can't help it, textbooks are too boring). This 'finishing' obsession could be the result of our parents( and teachers and aunts and principal) drumming it into our ears that reading is a good thing. And i was one of the few kids in my class who would get a pat on the back for being an avid reader, so not finishing a book was a way for the guilt to creep in( now you are not above the rest, you too find books boring). It took me some time to realize i don't not find all books to be boring, in fact , i love reading, and that it is o.k. to find some books to be boring.
Well said Seema, it pains me as well to leave a book unread...I'm compelled to read through any boring, meaningless book I may lay my hands on!
Post a Comment