No matter what the subject, social
media wants to know why you haven’t outraged on that ‘other’ matter
I don’t know if you’ve noticed but there
is a new malaise infecting the netherworld of social media. I like to call it
‘whataboutitis’. Others prefer the term ‘whataboutery’. But whatever you choose
to term it, this is an insidious disease that is steadily infecting the
universe of our social discourse. For the moment, it is restricted to the virtual
world but like all things trite and less than wonderful it will soon be an IRL
(that’s ‘In Real Life’ for all you newbies out there) phenomenon as well.
So, what is ‘whataboutitis’? Well, this
is basically how it plays out. You express an opinion about a political
party/current event/celebrity/politician. And no matter what the merit of the
opinion itself, you are instantly called out because you omitted to express an
opinion about that other political party/current event/celebrity/politician. That
omission, apparently, makes the opinion you did voice completely and utterly
invalid – pretty much useless, in fact. (Never mind if you did, in fact, have
your say about that ‘other’ matter; if people don’t remember it, it doesn’t
really count. Not on social media, anyway.)
The classic example is that of the 2002
Gujarat riots. You only have to mention them on social media and you will
instantly have to do battle with an army of ‘whatabouters’. What about the 1984
anti-Sikh riots, then, eh? Weren’t they as much a case of genocide? Did anybody
apologise for them? Did anyone go to jail? Isn’t Rajiv Gandhi as guilty as
Narendra Modi? Why are you just picking on Namo, then? Are you ‘paid media’? Or
just ‘sickular’?
And what about Godhra? Did you shed any
tears for the people who were killed on that train? Did their deaths not count?
Wasn’t that a pre-planned conspiracy? What about the Nellie massacre? Do you even
know how many died in that? Do they not matter because they happened in faraway
Assam? What about the Muzzafarnagar riots? Isn’t Akhilesh Yadav guilty for
letting them happen?
The questions just pile on, as
‘whataboutitis’ flares into an virtual epidemic, with nobody stopping to think
just how distasteful and vile it is to play partisan politics over the bodies
of dead Indians, no matter what their religion (or political affiliation) may
have been.
But this ‘whataboutitis’ is not restricted
to riots, either. It extends to most discussions about feminism, sexism and
women empowerment as well. It is impossible to stand up for any one woman
without being harangued about how you didn’t stand up for that other woman.
(The honest truth is that you did. But public memory is even shorter on social
media.)
In my own experience, every single time I
have tweeted against an instance of sexism against a woman in public life, the
‘whatabouters’ have struck back with nary a care for the truth. When I attacked
Sanjay Nirupam for making sexist comments about Smriti Irani on television, the
Congress brigade hit back at me with squeals of ‘whataboutery’. ‘What about
Narendra Modi’s sexist comment about Sunanda Pushkar? How come you weren’t
outraged about that as well?” (Well, actually I was, and I tweeted about that
too, thanks for asking.) On the other hand, whenever I comment on Modi’s sexist
remarks, the right wing brigade gets its knickers in a twist about the fact
that I hadn’t defended Smriti Irani against the smarmy comments of Sanjay
Nirupam. (Er, I wrote an entire column about it; you can Google search it once
you’ve stopped frothing at the mouth.) And what about the fact that I hadn’t
defended Sushma Swaraj when she was derided as a ‘nachaniya’ by such Congress
leaders as Digvijay Singh. (Only, of course, I did.)
Call Tarun Tejpal out on his Alchemy Of A
Liar and you are asked why you didn’t condemn Assaram Bapu in the same breath. Express
your anguish about the Delhi gang rape victim and you will get ‘what about all
the tribal women who get raped’. Comment on how long Sourav Ganguly took to
finally retire and the ‘What about Sachin?’ question will inevitably follow.
Stand up for Shah Rukh Khan’s right to air his views about what it means to be
Muslim in India and the ‘whatabouters’ will bring up Salman Khan and his
celebration of Ganesh Chathurti (now, isn’t that what ‘true secularism’ is
about?).
Complain about right-wing trolls who call
you names and threaten to rape you and you will be asked ‘What about the
Congress trolls who do the same thing?’ (Answer: please name and shame them
all; report spam; get their accounts blocked. I have zero tolerance for abusive
people on social media, no matter what their political affiliation. The reason
I outrage about the Sanghis is because they are the ones trolling me. The
moment Congress handles do the same, I will call them out as well.) Say you
like pizza and people will want to know what’s wrong with chaat. Talk about
loving Delhi and people will want to know what’s wrong with Mumbai. Praise
Peter and you will be asked ‘But what about Paul’?
I have to admit that despite my best
efforts to Stay Calm and Carry On, this epidemic of ‘whataboutitis’ is
beginning to get me down. I am seriously thinking of putting a disclaimer on my
social media feed: Please feel free to assume that I am outraged about
everything, unless I declare otherwise.
Do you think it would serve as an
antidote to ‘whataboutitis’? Well, a girl can dream, but I kind of suspect that
this nightmare has only just about started.
2 comments:
Maam, I saw your comment on Twitter about how men should be allowed to have their say on gender, re Farooq Abdullah.
I hope you won't lump this comment in the same category as whataboutitis, but it struck me that that SP politician, Naresh Agarwal was saying pretty much the same thing after the Tejpal case, when he said employers will now hesitate to employ women. Do you agree?
Ma'am I am a huge fan of yours, I completely agree with everything you have to say(It may seem too much but its the truth) Just wanted to let u know :)
Post a Comment