Was also a year that is best
forgotten…
This column will appear on the last
Sunday of 2014. And as I sit down to write it, I can’t help but think back on
the year gone by. But hard as I try to look for something positive, all the
images that flash before my eyes are of violence and grief; sadness and despair.
I guess that is only to be expected. The
aftershocks of the ghastly Taliban attack on a Peshawar school still have me
shaking with sadness, anger, and the realization of our impotence in the face
of crazed madmen who subscribe to a murderous ideology. Those gory pictures of
bullet-ridden children and a blood-soaked school auditorium will live with me
forever, no matter how much I try and erase them from my memory. And maybe
that’s how it should be. None of us should ever forget the evil that monsters
inflict upon us – and more tragically, on our children.
But even when I look beyond the horror of
Peshawar, the theme of violence and grief refuses to recede. The riot victims
of Muzaffarnagar continue to live in makeshift homes a year later, looking for
justice that seems forever out of reach. Communal riots in the Trilokpuri area
of Delhi have revived the traumatic memories of the 1984 pogrom against the
Sikhs. And in Uttar Pradesh, communal clashes have become so common that they
barely merit mention in the national papers. And yet, every such incident
leaves indelible scars in its wake.
More significantly, what every such clash
represents is an attack on the idea of India itself. That idea – of a secular,
inclusive, tolerant India that treats every citizen equally, no matter what his
or her religion – has increasingly come under attack as the lunatics scramble
to take over the asylum. The first weapon deployed in that fight was the idea
of ‘love jihad’: a ‘jihad’ in which Muslim men were apparently targeting Hindu
girls and marrying them after converting them to Islam. Thankfully that
campaign was junked after it didn’t get much traction in the UP polls.
Ever since then, though, we have had a
long line of loonies jostling one another in the competition to be most
outrageous. First off the mark was Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, a BJP minister, who
announced that the people of Delhi needed to decide if they wanted to be ruled
by ‘Ramzadas’ (children of Ram) or ‘H****zadas’ (bastards). Next up was BJP MP Sakshi
Maharaj, who claimed that Nathuram Godse was as much a ‘deshbhakt’ (patriot) as
Mahatma Gandhi. Both of them retracted these statements after a public outcry
(and presumably, a private bollocking from saner elements in the government).
But despite their climbdown, Godse, the
killer of Gandhiji, continues to be the flavor of the season with various
offshoots of the Sangh Parivar. Some fringe outfits in Mumbai celebrated
November 15, the day when Godse was hanged in 1949, as Shourya Divas. The Akhil
Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha asked the government to install busts of Godse in
public places across the country. And the same outfit is now threatening to
release a film, Desh Bhakht Nathuram Godse, on 30 January, the same
day on which Godse gunned down the Mahatma in 1948.
Ironic, isn’t it, that an organization
that styles itself as the ‘Hindu’ Mahasabha is attacking what is best about Hinduism
– its values of tolerance, brotherhood, and universal peace – by glorifying an assassin
who killed a man we venerate as a Mahatma? This really is violence of the worst
kind; violence that tries to destroy the very values that make Hinduism the
great religion that it is.
And that’s before we even start on the
biggest controversy of our day: conversions. If there is any one thing that
characterizes Hinduism it is its non-proselytising nature. You have to be born
a Hindu; you cannot become one by conversion. That is one of the essential
differences between Hinduism and both Islam and Christianity. Hindus don’t
believe in converting others to their faith. And you can’t really be a Hindu if
you do that.
Ah, but the right-wing crazies have a way
out of that. They are not converting anyone, they say, they are just welcoming
them back into the Hindu fold. It is not ‘conversion’ when Indian Muslims and
Christians become Hindus, they explain, it is merely a ‘gharwapasi’
(homecoming). Never mind that the ‘home-comers’ are complaining on national
television that they were misled/bribed/terrorized into giving up their faith.
All this banging on about religion; glorifying
murderers and assassins: where have we seen all this before? Ah yes, in
Pakistan, where that same sorry journey to religious extremism and militancy
led to the massacre of 132 innocent children in Peshawar this month. There, but
for the grace of Indian secularism, go we…
It is for all these reasons that I, for
one, will not be at all sad to see 2014 go. Maybe we’ll have a better time of
it in 2015. With that wish – and a prayer – I wish all of you a very Happy New
Year.
2 comments:
If someone wants to convert to Hinduism they can. Its their decision. Anyone can convert to any other religion, it is a right. You can't negate it.
very interestingly you have ignored to mention most important point of the year..Indian electorate giving simple majority to a single party after 30 years..one man shattering all electoral defeats and rasing to post of PM from being a tea-seller...
Post a Comment